Throughout the world international incidents represented by two major groups. One the international community (the UN) and the policy violators (Rough neck leaders or group). But always there is another major group stays behind the scene and control/influence the whole scenario, and stays out of the picture. Neither media nor UN don’t know or don’t announce their presence. Surprisingly they hold the key to resolve the whole situation, but they don’t use it.

Let’s start from Asia, shall we. Nepal a small monarchy, home of Himalaya has been turned into a civil war zone since 2002. Issues are rebel asking for democratic form of govt., without the influence of the royal family, and royal family won’t vow to that. So rebel movement turned into a bloody warfare. Here UN can just easily chop in the whole situation, by just pressure the royal family to arrange a democratic form of Monarchy. But hell why they will do that? They are good pressuring Middle East and Africa, Nepal don’t have any lucrative value: D

Second still Asia, this time Pakistan and India. Pakistan is almost 99% Muslim populated country, and India somewhat 60% Hindus and 30% Muslim populated. And known to all that they poses nuclear arsenal. These two countries has tendency to fight with each other since their birth. And they fought many bloody wars at the cost of millions of lives both side. Now that they both have Nuclear Weapon, no one can warranty that they won’t use it next time when they have a dispute. And on the other hand both countries have active radical terrorists.  So why not UN or NATO imposing a pressure to disarm these Nuclear threat? Hey how they will—Pakistan is allies of UK and India is ally with USA. :P. So UN just has to piss off, and focus on IRAN, since they are not friend of any body.

Next let’s talk about Israel. Independent research shows that Israel posses nuclear weapon. But neither UN nor NATO seems to have any concern about that. Even for an investigation. You have to agree Israel is no less violent than any other Middle Eastern countries, proof is Lebanon.  So what warranty can UN make that their certain overlook can’t cause a future disaster?

Than now Hezbollah the radical Lebanese group, who were blamed to carry out terrorist activities inside Israel? Yes there was definite proof of their violent activities. Where they get weapons and high-tech gadget to fight a massive successful battle? Since we all know Israel isn’t just another Middle Eastern country, it’s technologically advance compare to its neighbors.  Must be someone who is providing high-tech weaponry to them?  It can’t be radical Iran, since they don’t have match compare to American backed Israel. So shouldn’t UN concentrate finding the root off evil?

In all the above cases UN is sitting duck. Someone else setting policy for UN. UN needs to act much more as an influence rather than influenced.