Comments on: Fight back Spyware: CounterSpy http://bloggism.net/software/fight-back-spyware-counterspy/ Digitized Perception Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:45:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: jean http://bloggism.net/software/fight-back-spyware-counterspy/#comment-123204 jean Tue, 27 May 2008 13:12:51 +0000 http://bloggism.net/software/fight-back-spyware-counterspy/#comment-123204 kams, you are right. i didn't even notice it. i kept flipping back to the page found here <a href="http://www.counterspy.com" rel="nofollow">counterspy</A> to look for it but it connects me to the same page. thanks. kams, you are right. i didn’t even notice it.

i kept flipping back to the page found here counterspy
to look for it but it connects me to the same page. thanks.

]]> By: Kams(Kamrul) http://bloggism.net/software/fight-back-spyware-counterspy/#comment-121297 Kams(Kamrul) Sun, 18 May 2008 16:18:52 +0000 http://bloggism.net/software/fight-back-spyware-counterspy/#comment-121297 Jean, why don't you read this <a href="http://www.sunbelt-software.com/Home-Home-Office/CounterSpy/" rel="nofollow">page</a> on counterspy. The "CounterSpy V2 is the Only Anti-Spyware with" section located at the bottom portion of the page will give you the answer :). Jean, why don’t you read this page on counterspy. The “CounterSpy V2 is the Only Anti-Spyware with” section located at the bottom portion of the page will give you the answer :).

]]> By: jean http://bloggism.net/software/fight-back-spyware-counterspy/#comment-120225 jean Thu, 08 May 2008 03:14:15 +0000 http://bloggism.net/software/fight-back-spyware-counterspy/#comment-120225 does the counterspy anti-spyware scanned/quarantined list of Spyware details need to be seen? i was under the impression that counterspy only intercepts malware and infections that are from their updated database. does anyone know if this is the case? does the counterspy anti-spyware scanned/quarantined list of Spyware details need to be seen? i was under the impression that counterspy only intercepts malware and infections that are from their updated database.

does anyone know if this is the case?

]]>